Open Access

Intracortical injection of endothelin-1 induces cortical infarcts in mice: effect of neuronal expression of an adenosine transporter

  • Hanifi Soylu1,
  • Dali Zhang1,
  • Richard Buist2,
  • Melanie Martin1, 2, 3,
  • Benedict C Albensi1, 4 and
  • Fiona E Parkinson1Email author
Contributed equally
Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine20124:4

https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-7378-4-4

Received: 9 January 2012

Accepted: 12 March 2012

Published: 12 March 2012

Abstract

Background

Activation of adenosine A1 receptors has neuroprotective effects in animal stroke models. Adenosine levels are regulated by nucleoside transporters. In vitro studies showed that neuron-specific expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) decreases extracellular adenosine levels and adenosine A1 receptor activity. In this study, we tested the effect of hENT1 expression on cortical infarct size following intracerebral injection of the vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 (ET-1) or saline.

Methods

Mice underwent stereotaxic intracortical injection of ET-1 (1 μl; 400 pmol) or saline (1 μl). Some mice received the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine (25 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) 30 minutes prior to ET-1. Perfusion and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to measure cerebral blood flow (CBF) and subsequent infarct size, respectively.

Results

ET-1 reduced CBF at the injection site to 7.3 ± 1.3% (n = 12) in hENT1 transgenic (Tg) and 12.5 ± 2.0% (n = 13) in wild type (Wt) mice. At 48 hours following ET-1 injection, CBF was partially restored to 35.8 ± 4.5% in Tg and to 45.2 ± 6.3% in Wt mice; infarct sizes were significantly greater in Tg (9 ± 1.1 mm3) than Wt (5.4 ± 0.8 mm3) mice. Saline-treated Tg and Wt mice had modest decreases in CBF and infarcts were less than 1 mm3. For mice treated with caffeine, CBF values and infarct sizes were not significantly different between Tg and Wt mice.

Conclusions

ET-1 produced greater ischemic injury in hENT1 Tg than in Wt mice. This genotype difference was not observed in mice that had received caffeine. These data indicate that hENT1 Tg mice have reduced ischemia-evoked increases in adenosine receptor activity compared to Wt mice.

Keywords

Endothelin 1 Human Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 CD1 Mouse Magnetic Resonance Imaging Adenosine Caffeine

Background

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disabilities in developed countries. During stroke, a rapid depletion of ATP, dysregulation of ion channels and pumps, collapse of ion homeostasis, release of excitotoxic neurotransmitters, and intracellular calcium overload triggers a series of enzymatic cascades that result in neuronal death [1, 2]. Unfortunately, with the exception of tissue plasminogen activator, there are as yet no clear evidence-based strategies for treatment [2].

Adenosine is a neuromodulator that acts through a family of metabotropic receptors. Activation of adenosine A1 receptors, which are widely distributed in brain, has neuroprotective effects. In contrast, activation of A2A receptors, which are most abundant in basal ganglia, can promote cell injury [3]. Adenosine can be formed extracellularly from catabolism of ATP by a cascade of ecto-nucleotidases [4], or can be formed intracellularly from ATP consumed in energy requiring processes followed by hydrolysis of AMP by cytosolic 5'-nucleotidases. Equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENT) mediate cellular influx or efflux of adenosine and other nucleosides as dictated by their concentration gradients [5]. During pathophysiological events such as stroke or brain trauma, adenosine levels can increase up to 100-fold; the origin of this adenosine has been addressed in vitro using pharmacological tools but little information from in vivo studies is available [6, 7].

Genetically altered mice can be used to investigate ischemic injury at the molecular level [8]. One method for producing a cerebral infarct in rodents is intracerebral injection of the vasoconstrictor peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1) [911]. Compared to other methods for producing stroke, such as distal middle cerebral artery occlusion or thromboembolic models, ET-1 induced focal lesions are relatively simple and reproducible [12]. Moreover, ET-1 is not directly neurotoxic but produces a temporary reduction in blood flow for several hours at the injection site [13, 14].

In the present study ET-1 or saline was administered by intracortical injection to wild type (Wt) and transgenic (Tg) mice with neuron-specific expression of human ENT1 (hENT1) [15]. Local changes in cerebral blood flow and development of a cerebral infarct were monitored by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to test whether ENT1 over-expression affected stroke injury in a brain region expressing adenosine A1 receptors. The role of adenosine receptors in responses of Wt and Tg mice to ET-1 were examined with the antagonist caffeine.

Methods

Mice

CD1 mice with neuronal expression of hENT1 were generated as previously described [15]. To compare Tg to Wt mice, heterozygous Tg male mice were bred to Wt females and 8-10 week old (35-40 g) heterozygous Tg and Wt male littermates were used. All procedures and all outcome analyses were performed by individuals who were blinded to the genotype of the mice. All procedures with animals were approved by the University of Manitoba Animal Protocol Management and Review Committee.

Surgical procedure

Mice were anesthetized initially with 5% isoflurane for induction then maintained with 1.5-2% isoflurane in 30% oxygen and 70% nitrous oxide. Rectal temperature was kept between 37-37.5°C through a thermal pad during the procedure and was maintained by a heating lamp during the recovery. Mice were placed in a stereotaxic apparatus. Following a midline incision to the scalp, a small burr hole was placed in the right hemisphere. A 5 μl Hamilton syringe was used to inject 1 μg ET-1 (Sigma-Aldrich Canada, Oakville, ON, Canada) (400 pmol in 1 μl of saline) or saline (1 μl) to the cortex in 5 minutes. One group of mice received caffeine (25 mg/kg) by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection 30 minutes prior to intracortical injection of ET-1. The stereotaxic coordinates were determined from a mouse atlas [16] and were 1.0 mm anterior, and 1.0 mm lateral, to bregma and 1.2 mm below the pia. The needle was left in situ for 5 minutes to prevent back flow of ET-1 or saline before being slowly withdrawn. The hole was covered by bone wax and the incision was sutured.

Magnetic resonance imaging

Mice were examined with perfusion-weighted MRI at 4 and 48 hours post-injection to confirm decreased cerebral blood flow (CBF). In addition, they were examined with T2 weighted MRI at 48 hours to determine infarct size. A Bruker Biospec 7 T/21 cm spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Karlsruhe, Germany) with a quadrature volume coil (National Research Council, Winnipeg, MB, Canada) 2.5 cm in diameter was used for MRI. Mice were anesthetized with 1.5 to 2% isoflurane in 30% oxygen and 70% nitrous oxide and placed in an animal holder with a thermal pad keeping body temperature at 37 to 37.5°C. The respiration rate was monitored using a pneumatic pillow connected to a respiratory monitor (Small Animal Instruments Inc., Stony Brook, NY, USA). Relative CBF was measured using an adiabatic spin labeling sequence with a 36 -echo HASTE readout following a 400 ms post tagging delay at 1 mm slice thickness and in-plane resolution of 234 μm. Slices were obtained at the plane of the injection site and at bregma for CBF measurement.

For T2 weighted images a multi-slice 8-echo RARE method with effective echo time TE = 80 ms and slice thickness 0.5 mm and 100 μm in-plane resolution was used. A total of 12 continuous slices were obtained with 1 mm inter-slice spacing in two 6-slice sets.

MRI analysis was performed using Marevisi 7.2 analysis software (National Research Council, Winnipeg, MB, Canada). The depth of ischemia was assessed by measuring relative blood flow within a 0.9 cm diameter circular area centered on the injection site. Those values were expressed as a percentage of pre-injection CBF values. Ischemia was defined as a decrease in CBF to less than 20% of pre-injection CBF [18]. Infarct size was obtained by measuring the area of hyperintense pixels in T2 weighted images, multiplying by the slice thickness and summing to obtain the infarct volume for each animal.

Statistical analysis

The first study comparing outcomes of saline and ET-1 injections to Wt and Tg littermates was analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). In these ANOVAs, ipsilateral and contralateral CBF and ipsilateral infarct size were outcome variables and genotype (Wt or Tg) and drug (saline or ET-1) groups were treated as between-subject factors. For ipsilateral and contralateral CBF, assessments at 4 and 48 hours were examined for group differences. Follow-up pair-wise comparisons with Bonferroni adjustment of type I error were also conducted to examine differences across genotype and drug groups. The second study comparing outcomes of Wt and Tg littermates following i.p. injection of caffeine 30 minutes prior to intracortical injection of ET-1 was analyzed by two-way ANOVAs (CBF) or t-test (infarct size). No animals were excluded from analysis and no mortality occurred. All p-values were two-sided, and significance was set at a value of 0.05 for multiple comparisons. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS Version 9 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) or GraphPad Prism Version 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., LaJolla, CA).

Results

ET-1 and saline significantly decreased CBF at 4 hours post-injection

Perfusion weighted MRI was performed at 4 and 48 hours following intra-cortical injections of ET-1 or saline and representative pseudocolor images are shown in Figure 1A. Compared to pre-injection values, ipsilateral CBF (± SEM) was decreased following injection of ET-1 or saline (Figure 2). Analysis of ipsilateral CBF at 4 hours indicated a significant effect of genotype (F(1,29) = 27.4, p < 0.01), a significant drug effect (F(1,29) = 126.1, p < 0.001) and a significant genotype by drug interaction (F(1,29) = 14.8, p < 0.01). Follow-up pair-wise comparisons indicated that ET-1 produced a greater decrease in CBF than saline, and a genotype difference was observed in mice injected with saline (p < 0.05) but not in mice injected with ET-1. Analysis of contralateral CBF at 4 hours also indicated a significant effect of genotype (F(1,29) = 7.01, p < 0.05) and a significant drug effect (F(1,29) = 10.6, p < 0.01) as ET-1 produced a greater decrease in contralateral CBF in hENT1 Tg mice than in Wt littermates (Figure 2, inset).
Figure 1

Perfusion weighted and T 2 weighted MR images after cortical injection of 1 μl ET-1. A . Representative perfusion weighted MR images obtained from a Wt mouse before injection (pre; left) of ET-1 (400 pmol; 1 μl), and at 4 hours (4 h; middle) and 48 hours (2 d; right) post-ET-1 injection. Pseudocolor scale bar shows average cerebral blood flow (CBF) pre-injection (Avg) and ischemic threshold, set at 20% of pre-injection average (20%). B . Representative T2 weighted MR images obtained from a Wt mouse 48 hours post-injection of ET-1. In each panel, the number at the upper left shows the position relative to bregma. The arrow shows the injection site at +1.0 mm anterior to bregma.

Figure 2

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is decreased 4 hours after intra-cortical injection of endothelin-1 (ET-1) or saline. CBF was quantitated, relative to pre-injection set at 100%, in a 0.9 cm diameter circular region-of-interest centered on the injection site. Two-way ANOVA of ipsilateral CBF indicated a significant effect of genotype (F(1, 29) = 27.4, p < 0.01), a significant drug effect (F(1, 29) = 136.1, p < 0.001) and a significant genotype by drug interaction (F(1, 29) = 14.8, p < 0.01). Bonferroni post-tests indicated a significant difference (p < 0.05) between Wt and Tg mice injected with saline but not between Wt and Tg mice injected with ET-1. Inset ET-1, but not saline, injections were associated with decreased contralateral CBF. Two-way ANOVA of contralateral CBF at 4 hours also indicated a significant effect of genotype (F(1, 29) = 7.01, p < 0.05) and a significant drug effect (F(1, 29) = 10.6, p < 0.01). Bonferroni post-tests indicated that ET-1 produced a significantly greater decrease in contralateral CBF in Tg mice than in Wt littermates (p < 0.05). Data are means ± SEM, n = 12 Tg ET-1, 13 Wt ET-1, 4 Tg saline and 4 Wt saline.

CBF decreases persist 48 hours following injection of ET-1 but not saline

At 48 hours after injection of ET-1 the decrease in ipsilateral CBF was still evident whereas at 48 hours after injection of saline CBF was restored to pre-injection levels (Figure 3). Two-way ANOVA revealed a statistically significant effect of drug (F (1, 29) = 50.9, p < 0.001), with a significant difference between ET-1 and saline injected mice (p < 0.05). No significant effect of genotype was detected. The small decreases in contralateral CBF that were observed 4 hours after ET-1 injection were resolved by 48 hours (Figure 3, inset).
Figure 3

Decreases in ipsilateral cerebral blood flow (CBF) persist for 48 hours after intra-cortical injection of endothelin-1 (ET-1). CBF was quantitated in a 0.9 cm diameter circular region-of-interest centered on the injection site. Two-way ANOVA revealed a statistically significant effect of drug (F (1, 29) = 50.9, p < 0.001) and Bonferroni post-tests revealed a significant effect of ET-1 for both Wt and Tg mice (p < 0.05). No significant differences between Tg and Wt were detected. Inset Contralateral CBF was restored to control levels 48 hours after injection of either saline or ET-1. Data are means ± SEM, n = 12 Tg ET-1, 13 Wt ET-1, 4 Tg saline and 4 Wt saline.

Intra-cortical ET-1 injections produce a greater infarct size in hENT1 Tg than Wt mice

T2 weighted MRI was performed at 48 hours following intra-cortical injections of ET-1 or saline and representative images are shown in Figure 1B. Saline injections produced measurable infarcts (0.3 ± 0.1 mm3 for Wt and 0.7 ± 0.4 mm3 for hENT1 Tg) that were smaller than infarcts resulting from ET-1 injections (5.4 ± 0.8 mm3 for Wt and 9.0 ± 1.1 mm3 for hENT1 Tg) (Figure 4). Two-way ANOVA indicated a significant drug effect (F(1, 27) = 22.3, p < 0.001). Pair-wise comparisons indicated no difference between Wt and hENT1 Tg mice injected with saline but a significantly larger infarct in hENT1 Tg, relative to Wt mice, following ET-1 injection (p < 0.05).
Figure 4

Ischemic injury from ET-1 injection is greater in hENT1 Tg mice compared to Wt littermates. Ischemic infarct size was determined from T2 weighted MRI at 48 hours post injection of either saline or ET-1. Two-way ANOVA indicated a significant drug effect (F(1, 27) = 22.3, p < 0.001). Bonferroni post-tests indicated no difference between Wt and hENT1 Tg mice injected with saline but a significantly larger infarct in hENT1 Tg, relative to Wt mice, following ET-1 injection (p < 0.05). Data are means ± SEM, n = 12 Tg ET-1, 13 Wt ET-1, 4 Tg saline and 4 Wt saline.

Caffeine abolishes genotype differences in response to ET-1 injections

The severe and long-lasting decrease in CBF following intracortical injection of ET-1 was also observed in mice pre-treated with caffeine. At 4 hours following ET-1 injection, ipsilateral CBF was reduced below the ischemic threshold of 20% in both Wt and Tg mice (Figure 5A). At 48 hours after ET-1 injection, ipsilateral CBF was restored to approximately 50% of pre-ischemic levels, in both genotypes (Figure 5B). At 4 hours after ET-1 injection, contralateral CBF was reduced to 77% and 87% in Tg and Wt mice, respectively, and was restored to 93% and 99%, respectively, by 48 hours following ET-1 injection. Ischemic infarct sizes, measured at 48 hours, were 6.2 ± 1 and 6.7 ± 1 mm3, and were not significantly different between Tg and Wt mice (Figure 5C).
Figure 5

Caffeine pre-treatment abolished the genotype difference in severity of ET-1 induced cerebral infarcts. Mice were injected with the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine (25 mg/kg, i.p.) 30 minutes prior to intracerebral injection of ET-1. A. Ipsilateral CBF was decreased to less than 20% in both Tg and Wt mice; contralateral CBF was decreased by less than 20% at 4 hours post ET-1 injection. B . At 48 hours post ET-1 injection, partial recovery of ipsilateral CBF and full recovery of contralateral CBF was evident. C . Ischemic infarct size, determined 48 hours after ET-1 injection was similar in Tg and Wt mice. Data are means ± SEM; n = 10 Tg, 10 Wt mice.

Discussion

The main finding of this study was that hENT1 Tg mice showed similar decreases in CBF, but had greater infarct sizes following ET-1 injection than Wt mice. Systemic pretreatment with the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine abolished the genotype differences in infarct size, implicating differences in endogenous adenosine and adenosine receptor activity between Wt and hENT1 Tg mice.

ET-1 has been used previously to produce experimental strokes in rats [9, 10, 13] but mixed success has been reported with mice [8, 11, 17] leading some to conclude that ET-1 is not useful for mouse stroke models [8, 12]. We found a significant CBF response to ET-1 injection that persisted for at least 48 hours ipsilaterally and led to cortical infarcts greater than 5 mm3. Using laser Doppler to measure CBF changes in mice after intracortical ET-1 injection, Wang et al. (2007) reported an 80% drop in CBF following 1 μg ET-1 injection, similar to the 90% drop in CBF at 4 hours that we report, and cortical infarcts of approximately 12 mm3 [11]. Therefore, we conclude that ET-1 is an effective method for establishing a cortical infarct in mice.

We did observe one limitation to the use of ET-1. We found batch to batch variability in the stroke sizes produced by ET-1 injections. Thus, while the genotype difference in stroke size that we report here was also seen in pilot experiments, the average infarct sizes were different with each ET-1 preparation.

Previously, it has been reported that a decrease in CBF to 20% of control levels is required for stroke injury [18]. In this study, ET-1 administration produced an effect on CBF that equaled or surpassed this level of ischemia. The duration of the ischemic episode was not determined specifically, but was at least 4 hours. Using saline as a volume control, we found that mechanical or traumatic factors associated with injections produced decreases in CBF in ipsilateral cortex that persisted for 4 hours; however, these injections produced small infarcts that amounted to approximately 10% of the infarct sizes observed with injections of an equal volume of ET-1. From our data it appears that saline administration produced small cerebral infarcts without decreasing CBF below 20%. As CBF was determined using a circle of 0.9 cm diameter centered on the injection site, the small infarct sizes are likely associated with ischemic areas, of CBF below 20%, that are smaller than the 0.9 cm diameter circle. It is also possible that a more severe decrease in CBF occurred but resolved within 4 hours of saline injection.

Both saline and ET-1 produced measurable decreases in contralateral CBF; however, these decreases were modest and not of a magnitude associated with cerebral infarct. In studies using unilateral stroke models, it is sometimes assumed that the contralateral hemisphere is spared from CBF changes and that it can serve as an internal control [19]. However, contralateral cell death has been observed after middle cerebral and common carotid artery occlusion to ipsilateral hemisphere [19, 20]. Furthermore, contralateral changes in hypoxia induced factor-1α, P-Akt, P-ERK1/2 and the proinflammatory cytokines IL-β, TNF-α and TNF-β have been observed in the absence of histopathological evidence for ischemic injury [21]. These results all indicate that a central autoregulatory system can affect CBF responses in brain regions beyond the immediate site of injury.

Adenosine is an important neuromodulator in many neurological events including ischemia, hypoxia and seizures [22]. During ischemic conditions, increases in adenosine levels of up to 100-fold have been measured [6, 7]. This adenosine may be derived from neurons, astrocytes, or other cells that release ATP, which is then metabolized extracellularly to adenosine by ecto-nucleotidases [4]. Alternatively, adenosine can be released from cells via ENT-mediated efflux, a process that has been documented in neuronal cell cultures [23, 24]. Other mechanisms of adenosine release, including vesicular release from neurons or astrocytes have been proposed [2527]. In the present study, ET-1 was injected directly into a brain region that is rich in adenosine A1 receptors and expresses few A2A receptors. This injection produced a similar decrease in CBF in Wt and hENT1 Tg mice at the injection site yet the resulting cerebral infarct volume was significantly greater in hENT1 Tg mice relative to Wt. This indicates that hENT1 Tg mice had reduced endogenous neuroprotection or enhanced neurotoxicity, relative to Wt mice. Using hippocampal slice preparations, we recently reported that slices from hENT1 Tg mice show increased adenosine uptake and reduced adenosine receptor activity in response to hypoxic or ischemic conditions than slices from Wt mice [28], consistent with the results of the present study. Because the brain region targeted by ET-1 injections expresses A1 receptors at a much higher density than A2A receptors [29], it is likely that the effect of hENT1 expression to increase stroke injury is a direct consequence of reduced ischemia-induced increases in adenosine and decreased A1 receptor activation, relative to Wt mice [28]. A recent study using ENT1 null mice reported decreased ischemia-reperfusion injury to heart relative to Wt controls [30], which is consistent with the increased infact size in ENT1 over-expressing mice reported here.

Caffeine is a non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist with approximate Ki values of 12 and 2.4 μM for A1 and A2A receptors [31]. Caffeine was used for this study because of its clinical significance as a commonly consumed psychoactive drug. Furthermore, caffeine has been used previously in Wt and hENT1 Tg mice and found to affect motor activity and ethanol-induced motor coordination [15, 32]. The pharmacokinetics of caffeine has been examined in mice and a half-life of 25 minutes was reported [33]. Therefore, 30 minutes after caffeine treatment, at the time of ET-1 injection, caffeine levels are expected to still be in a range at which pharmacological effects have been observed in previous studies [15]. After caffeine administration, ET-1 no longer produced a significantly greater ischemic injury in Tg mice relative to Wt mice. These data further indicate that adenosine receptor activity is important for the difference in stroke injury size between Tg and Wt mice. The apparent lack of effect of caffeine in Tg mice may indicate that adenosine A1 receptor activity was minimal in the penumbral region in these mice, as a direct consequence of the increased neuronal uptake of adenosine mediated by functional hENT1.

Conclusions

Cortical ET-1 injection is a relatively simple and reproducible technique for producing a cerebral infarct in mice. Following ET-1 injection, Tg mice expressing hENT1 in neurons showed a greater cerebral infarct size than Wt mice. Caffeine treatment prior to ET-1 injection abolished this genotype difference, implicating adenosine receptors in determining final infarct size. Our results can be explained by ENT mediated influx of adenosine into neurons and attenuated adenosine A1 receptor activity. This indicates that, during ischemia, neurons do not release adenosine via ENTs but actively salvage adenosine, which may be released by another mechanism, from another cell type, or formed extracellularly from released adenine nucleotides.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Manitoba and the St. Boniface General Hospital Research Foundation. B.C.A. holds the Honourable Douglas Everett, Patricia Everett and the Royal Canadian Properties Endowment Fund Chair and is a Research Affiliate at the University of Manitoba's Centre on Aging. H.S. is the recipient of a Canadian Institutes for Health Research Master's Award.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departments of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Manitoba
(2)
Departments of Radiology, University of Manitoba
(3)
Department of Physics, University of Winnipeg
(4)
Division of Neurodegenerative Disorders, St Boniface Hospital Research Centre

References

  1. Szydlowska K, Tymianski M: Calcium, ischemia and excitotoxicity. Cell Calcium 2010, 47: 122–129. 10.1016/j.ceca.2010.01.003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Deb P, Sharma S, Hassan KM: Pathophysiologic mechanisms of acute ischemic stroke: An overview with emphasis on therapeutic significance beyond thrombolysis. Pathophysiology 2010, 17: 197–218. 10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.12.001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Gui L, Duan W, Tian H, Li C, Zhu J, Chen JF, et al.: Adenosine A 2A receptor deficiency reduces striatal glutamate outflow and attenuates brain injury induced by transient focal cerebral ischemia in mice. Brain Res 2009, 1297: 185–193.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Matsuoka I, Ohkubo S: ATP- and adenosine-mediated signaling in the central nervous system: adenosine receptor activation by ATP through rapid and localized generation of adenosine by ecto-nucleotidases. J Pharmacol Sci 2004, 94: 95–99. 10.1254/jphs.94.95PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zamzow CR, Xiong W, Parkinson FE: Adenosine produced by neurons is metabolized to hypoxanthine by astrocytes. J Neurosci Res 2008, 86: 3447–3455. 10.1002/jnr.21789PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Parkinson FE, Zhang YW, Shepel PN, Greenway SC, Peeling J, Geiger JD: Effects of nitrobenzylthioinosine on neuronal injury, adenosine levels, and adenosine receptor activity in rat forebrain ischemia. J Neurochem 2000, 75: 795–802.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Frenguelli BG, Wigmore G, Llaudet E, Dale N: Temporal and mechanistic dissociation of ATP and adenosine release during ischaemia in the mammalian hippocampus. J Neurochem 2007, 101: 1400–1413. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04425.xPubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Horie N, Maag AL, Hamilton SA, Shichinohe H, Bliss TM, Steinberg GK: Mouse model of focal cerebral ischemia using endothelin-1. J Neurosci Meth 2008, 173: 286–290. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.06.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuxe K, Cintra A, Andbjer B, Anggard E, Goldstein M, Agnati LF: Centrally administered endothelin-1 produces lesions in the brain of the male rat. Acta Physiol Scand 1989, 137: 155–156. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1989.tb08733.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilmour G, Iversen SD, O'Neill MF, Bannerman DM: The effects of intracortical endothelin-1 injections on skilled forelimb use: implications for modelling recovery of function after stroke. Behav Brain Res 2004, 150: 171–183. 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.07.006PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang Y, Jin K, Greenberg DA: Neurogenesis associated with endothelin-induced cortical infarction in the mouse. Brain Res 2007, 1167: 118–122.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bacigaluppi M, Comi G, Hermann DM: Animal models of ischemic stroke. Part two: modeling cerebral ischemia. Open Neurol J 2010, 4: 34–38.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Windle V, Szymanska A, Granter-Button S, White C, Buist R, Peeling J, et al.: An analysis of four different methods of producing focal cerebral ischemia with endothelin-1 in the rat. Exp Neurol 2006, 201: 324–334. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.04.012PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Luo J, Grammas P: Endothelin-1 is elevated in Alzheimer's disease brain microvessels and is neuroprotective. J Alzheimers Dis 2010, 21: 887–896.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Parkinson FE, Xiong W, Zamzow CR, Chestley T, Mizuno T, Duckworth ML: Transgenic expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 in mouse neurons. J Neurochem 2009, 109: 562–572. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05991.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Paxinos G: Franklin KBJ: The mouse brain in sterotaxic coordinates. 2nd edition. San Diego: Academic; 2001.Google Scholar
  17. Sozmen EG, Kolekar A, Havton LA, Carmichael ST: A white matter stroke model in the mouse: axonal damage, progenitor responses and MRI correlates. J Neurosci Meth 2009, 180: 261–272. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.03.017View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Siesjo BK: Pathophysiology and treatment of focal cerebral ischemia. Part I: Pathophysiology. J Neurosurg 1992, 77: 169–184. 10.3171/jns.1992.77.2.0169PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Villapol S, Bonnin P, Fau S, Baud O, Renolleau S, Charriaut-Marlangue C: Unilateral blood flow decrease induces bilateral and symmetric responses in the immature brain. Am J Pathol 2009, 175: 2111–2120. 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090257PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Spiegler M, Villapol S, Biran V, Goyenvalle C, Mariani J, Renolleau S, et al.: Bilateral changes after neonatal ischemia in the P7 rat brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2007, 66: 481–490. 10.1097/01.jnen.0000263875.22306.3cPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. van den Tweel ER, Kavelaars A, Lombardi MS, Nijboer CH, Groenendaal F, van Bel F, et al.: Bilateral molecular changes in a neonatal rat model of unilateral hypoxic-ischemic brain damage. Pediatr Res 2006, 59: 434–439. 10.1203/01.pdr.0000200799.64038.19PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Dale N, Frenguelli BG: Release of adenosine and ATP during ischemia and epilepsy. Curr Neuropharmacol 2009, 7: 160–179. 10.2174/157015909789152146PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Zamzow CR, Xiong W, Parkinson FE: Astrocytes affect the profile of purines released from cultured cortical neurons. J Neurosci Res 2008, 86: 2641–2649. 10.1002/jnr.21718PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Parkinson FE, Xiong W: Stimulus- and cell-type-specific release of purines in cultured rat forebrain astrocytes and neurons. J Neurochem 2004, 88: 1305–1312. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02266.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin ED, Fernandez M, Perea G, Pascual O, Haydon PG, Araque A, et al.: Adenosine released by astrocytes contributes to hypoxia-induced modulation of synaptic transmission. Glia 2007, 55: 36–45. 10.1002/glia.20431PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Wall MJ, Dale N: Auto-inhibition of rat parallel fibre-Purkinje cell synapses by activity-dependent adenosine release. J Physiol 2007, 581: 553–565. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.126417PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wall MJ, Dale N: Activity-dependent release of adenosine: a critical re-evaluation of mechanism. Curr Neuropharmacol 2008, 6: 329–337. 10.2174/157015908787386087PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang D, Xiong W, Albensi BC, Parkinson FE: Expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 in mouse neurons regulates adenosine levels in physiological and hypoxic-ischemic conditions. J Neurochem 2011, 118: 4–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Lopes LV, Halldner L, Rebola N, Johansson B, Ledent C, Chen JF, et al.: Binding of the prototypical adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist CGS 21680 to the cerebral cortex of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor knockout mice. Br J Pharmacol 2004, 141: 1006–1014. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705692PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Rose JB, Naydenova Z, Bang A, Eguchi M, Sweeney G, Choi DS, et al.: Equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 plays an essential role in cardioprotection. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2010, 298: H771-H777. 10.1152/ajpheart.00711.2009PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Fredholm BB, Battig K, Holmen J, Nehlig A, Zvartau EE: Actions of caffeine in the brain with special reference to factors that contribute to its widespread use. Pharmacol Rev 1999, 51: 83–133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kost S, Sun C, Xiong W, Graham K, Cass CE, Young JD, et al.: Behavioral effects of elevated expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 in mice. Behav Brain Res 2011, 224: 44–49. 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.05.023PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Buters JT, Tang BK, Pineau T, Gelboin HV, Kimura S, Gonzalez FJ: Role of CYP1A2 in caffeine pharmacokinetics and metabolism: studies using mice deficient in CYP1A2. Pharmacogenetics 1996, 6: 291–296. 10.1097/00008571-199608000-00002PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Soylu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement