Skip to main content

The 1027th target candidate in stroke: Will NADPH oxidase hold up?


As recently reviewed, 1026 neuroprotective drug candidates in stroke research have all failed on their road towards validation and clinical translation, reasons being quality issues in preclinical research and publication bias. Quality control guidelines for preclinical stroke studies have now been established. However, sufficient understanding of the underlying mechanisms of neuronal death after stroke that could be possibly translated into new therapies is lacking. One exception is the hypothesis that cellular death is mediated by oxidative stress. Oxidative stress is defined as an excess of reactive oxygen species (ROS) derived from different possible enzymatic sources. Among these, NADPH oxidases (NOX1-5) stand out as they represent the only known enzyme family that has no other function than to produce ROS. Based on data from different NOX knockout mouse models in ischemic stroke, the most relevant isoform appears to be NOX4. Here we discuss the state-of-the-art of this target with respect to stroke and open questions that need to be addressed on the path towards clinical translation.

Lack of mechanistic insight hampers innovation

One third of all patients do not survive a stroke, and in those who do, brain damage can be so severe that it results in life-long disability [1]. In this review, we will focus on ischemic stroke (87% of all stroke cases) and on both, the disturbed oxygen and nutrient supply to the infarcted region and the consequences of reperfusion.

Neurons start dying already 5 minutes after lacking oxygen. The only approved treatment for acute stroke is an early intravenous administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) to restore cerebral blood flow. However, even if blood flow is restored and no bleeding occurs, reperfusion can paradoxically aggravate neuronal damage. Mechanistically, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated from the newly arriving oxygen, i.e. ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury, are thought to play a major role in this. Hence, to prevent brain damage after an ischemic stroke novel therapeutic strategies that specifically address this paradox are urgently needed.

A roadblock in stroke research

Unfortunately, despite tremendous research activities, all therapeutic strategies that at some stage showed promising results in pre-clinical animal models have finally failed before or in clinical testing [2]. A systematic review covering 8516 stroke-relevant studies added this up to 1026 candidate strategies finally failing [3]. 114 out of 1026 neuroprotective drugs were tested in patients, 42% even quite pre-maturely, i.e. before the results from animal testing were reported. On top of this, drugs that had been selected for clinical trials were not necessarily the most efficient ones based on animal data. This roadblock in stroke innovation [4] has raised fundamental concerns about the general approach and translatability of pre-clinical stroke research. Possible explanations for an impaired translatability are the divergences between pre-clinical animal models and the clinical situation in real patients [5]. Therefore, older animals with co-morbidities should be tested and actual clinical endpoints should be considered in order to better mimic clinical conditions (Table 1) [6]. Furthermore, only very few studies (3%) reported sample size calculations, and thus the majority of studies might have been underpowered to detect real differences (Table 1). Another important aspect is the problem of publication bias in favour of positive results [7]. These quality concerns are not only related to the field of stroke research and rather apply to animal models in general. To improve the quality of pre-clinical stroke research the Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) published criteria in 1999 [8], which were updated in 2009 [9].

Table 1 Prevalence of pre-clinical stroke guidelines in stroke studies using NOX knockout mice

Mechanism of stroke #1027: Oxidative stress and how to tackle it

How was the oxidative stress hypothesis addressed so far and why do we believe that NADPH oxidase is a highly promising target to induce neuroprotection?

ROS are non-radical and radical reactive molecules. They are formed when one electron is transferred to molecular oxygen, forming the superoxide anion (O2 -). O2 - can be rapidly dismutated into more stable species such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), or - in the presence of nitric oxide (NO) - it forms the peroxynitrite anion (ONOO-). Importantly, all of these form a potentially disease-triggering mixture of ROS.

ROS have a short half-life and are therefore difficult to measure. Furthermore, there is no method that is able to distinguish the different types of ROS formed. Often, global ROS levels are measured and localised in situ using dihydroethidium (DHE), which, after its oxidation, can be detected as red nuclear fluorescence [22]. In vivo, measuring ROS using DHE is difficult because the intravenously injected DHE hardly reaches ischemic regions [11].

Importantly, ROS are not only detrimental. Rather, they also serve as essential signalling molecules that for example regulate vascular tone, oxygen tension and erythropoietin production [23]. In a healthy brain, as in any organ, there is a balance of pro- and anti-oxidants. If pro-oxidants become too prominent, oxidative stress arises. Most times, oxidative stress is caused by an elevated production of ROS. This may be an important underlying mechanism of I/R damage caused by an ischemic stroke.

The free-radical scavenger NXY-059 was first considered as a major breakthrough by stroke researchers. The drug fulfilled all major STAIR criteria and its highly promising pre-clinical data, even in non-human primates, led to the largest neuroprotective trials in stroke research. Whereas the first, although underpowered, phase III trial (SAINT I) still left room for hope by improving disability 90 days post stroke after NXY-059 treatment [24], a second larger trial (SAINT II) highlighted the inefficiency of the anti-oxidative drug [25]. After the huge disappointment, many scientists were preoccupied with the question why this promising radical scavenger finally failed? Reasons may be that different outcomes have been measured and that there was a treatment delay compared to pre-clinical studies [26]. NXY-059 is also a weak antioxidant and has poor blood–brain-barrier penetration [27]. Bath et al. [28] also suggested that negative publication bias (unpublished data from AstraZeneca) might have led to an initial overestimation of efficacy.

In general, all major clinical trials aiming to provide proof-of-principle of the oxidative stress theory by applying antioxidants have failed or can even be harmful and lead to increased mortality [29, 30]. Nevertheless, it would be a mistake to dismiss the oxidative stress hypothesis.

Many likely reasons for the lack of clinical efficacy of antioxidants, also for other diseases have been suggested, which are discussed in more detail elsewhere [31, 32]. The possible reasons, for example, include differences between animal models and patients as discussed above, e.g. presence/absence of co-morbidities, gender and age. Additionally, it is unlikely that antioxidant supplements can work in humans as for example ROS are not evenly distributed within the body, or not even within a cell, and supplemented antioxidants are not targeted to these specific sites. Further, antioxidants cannot distinguish between physiological and pathological ROS. ROS may also cause damage already before they are inactivated by antioxidants.

A far superior strategy may thus be to tackle the problem at its root by inhibiting the formation of ROS in the first place rather than attempting to scavenge them after they have been formed [31]. However, a prerequisite is to identify the disease-relevant sources of ROS. Several sources of ROS exist, including mitochondria [33], xanthine oxidase (XO) [34, 35], monoamine oxidase [36], tyrosine hydroxylase [36], L-amino acid oxidase [36], lipid peroxidases [37], uncoupled nitric oxide synthase (NOS) [38], cytochrome P450 (CYP450) [39], cyclooxygenase (COX) and NADPH oxidases (NOX) [36]. Except for one enzyme family, all these sources have primarily functions other than producing ROS. They rather form ROS as by-products (mitochondria) because of substrate/cofactor shortage (XO, NOS), or as physiological intermediates (CYP450, COX). Only NADPH oxidases have ROS production as primary role [40, 41]. NADPH oxidases are a major source of ROS in the vascular system [42], in phagocytes [43], in cerebral vessels [36] and perhaps also in neurons [44].

NADPH oxidases

NADPH oxidases are multi-subunit complexes. Seven homologues of the catalytic subunit exist, NOX1-5 and the dual oxidases DUOX1 and 2 that also contain a peroxidase-like domain [41, 45, 46]. NADPH oxidases not only differ in their catalytic subunit NOX, but also in their subunit requirements, in tissue and (sub)cellular localization and also in the nature of the ROS produced (Table 2) [41, 46, 47].

Table 2 Overview of regulation, ROS product, and localization of the different NOX isoforms

Tissue distribution and cellular localization

NOX1, 2, 4 and 5 are expressed in blood vessels. However, NOX5 is not present in rats and mice. NOX3 is expressed in the inner ear and DUOX1 and DUOX2 are expressed in thyroid, with DUOX2 also being present in lung and gastrointestinal tract epithelium. [47, 48]. As NOX3, as well as DUOX1 and DUOX2, are neither expressed in the vasculature nor in the brain, they are not relevant for stroke and will thus not be further discussed in this review. A summary of the tissue and cellular distribution of NOX1, 2, 4 and 5 is given in Table 2.

NOX1 is predominantly found in colon epithelia [49], but also at lower levels in cerebral cells (neurons, astrocytes and microglia) [50] and in vessels. In the vasculature, NOX1 is usually restricted to vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) [51]. Indeed, NOX1 knockout (KO) mice have slightly reduced blood pressure and a reduced pressor response to angiotensin II [52, 53].

NOX2 was first discovered in phagocytes and was previously called gp91phox. The role of NOX2 in neutrophils is host defence [41]. Besides circulating neutrophils, it was also detected in the brain (mainly in microglia) and in vascular cells [41]. In vessels, NOX2 is present in endothelial cells (ECs) and fibroblasts [54], and also in infiltrating monocytes, macrophages and T-cells when underlying pathology is present.

NOX4 (previously called renox) is widely distributed with high physiological levels in the kidneys [55], lung [56] and vasculature [57]. Therefore, knocking out the NOX4 gene was expected to induce arteriolar hypotension, altered pulmonary and renal function. However, surprisingly, deletion of NOX4 did not cause any respective abnormal basal phenotype [12, 58]. NOX4 is the most dominant isoform in vessels and its levels are even higher in cerebral vessels [59]. NOX4 mRNA is expressed in ECs, VSMCs and fibroblasts [40]. Expressed and functionally active NOX4 has also been found in neurons [60] and astrocytes [11].

As NOX5 is not expressed in rodent cells, it has not been studied in classical NOX KO studies [61]. In other species, NOX5 was detected in testis, spleen, kidney, lymphocytes, ECs and VSMCs [62].

In summary, different NOX homologues have different functions in different cell types, and subcellular localization is also an important determinant of NOX function. For more detailed information we refer to other reviews [41, 47].


All NOX isoforms contain six trans-membrane domains with two heme-binding sites and on the cytosolic tails binding-sites for FAD and NADPH [63]. A number of regulatory subunits have been identified for the NADPH oxidases. NOX1-4 form heterodimers with the membrane-bound p22phox subunit [64].

NOX2 was the first isoform identified and thus is the best-studied isoform. Subunits that are needed for NOX2 activation are divided into two groups: activating molecules (p67phox) and organizing molecules (p47phox). Upon phosphorylation of p47phox, cytosolic subunits (p40phox, p47phox and p67phox) translocate to the cell membrane and bind to intracellular loops of NOX2. Activators bind to Rac in the cytosol and then migrate towards NOX2 with help of the organizers [41] (Figure 1). For ROS production by NOX2, Rac and p47phox have to be activated simultaneously.

Figure 1
figure 1

Relevant NOX isoforms in stroke and their respective subunit requirements (adapted from[46]). NOX2, as well as NOX4, seem to be implicated in stoke. Known regulatory proteins are associated with individual isoforms. Activator proteins are coloured in green and organizing proteins in blue. Both isoforms form functional dimers with p22phox. p47phox phosphorylation subsequently causes the cytosolic subunits p47phox, p67phox, and p40phox to translocate into membranes and fuse with the catalytic subunit NOX2. This is followed by interaction between Rac and NOX2. Nox4 forms a dimer with p22phox. Although NOX4 does not appear to require additional regulators, recently some NOX4 binding proteins (DPI and PolDip2) have been discovered whose role needs to be further elucidated. Potential target sites of NADPH oxidase inhibitors are also shown in the scheme.

Similar to NOX2, NOX1 is also regulated by cytosolic units. Its organizer molecule NOXO1 constitutively interacts with the membrane and does not need phosphorylation like p47phox. Therefore, NOX1 seems to be active under basal conditions [65]. The activating molecule of NOX1 is called NOXA1.

NOX4 seems to only need interaction with p22phox, but does not necessarily require any of the known cytosolic subunits to be active. NOX4 was therefore suggested to be constitutively active, and thus its activity may directly be related to its protein levels [66]. Recently, Rac implication in NOX4 activation has also been excluded [67]. However, stimulus-induced ROS production by NOX4 has been observed; and maybe other, yet unknown factors play a role in NOX4 activity regulation. It has been shown that polymerase (DNA-directed) delta interacting protein 2 (PolDip2) interacts with p22phox, which promotes NOX4 linking to the cytoskeleton [68] (Figure 1). Furthermore, protein disulphide isomerase (PDI) may also bind to NOX4, as well as to NOX1 [69]. However, the role of PolDip2 and PDI in regulating NADPH oxidases has to be further investigated.

NOX5 does not require heterodimerization with p22phox. Interestingly, NOX5 is directly activated by calcium, which can bind on the EF-hand motives of the N-terminal tail of NOX5 [41, 46]. Although it is generally agreed that there is no need for other NOX5 binding proteins, a recent study showed that Hsp90 binds to NOX1, 2 and 5 and that this binding is needed to confer enzyme stability [70]. Five splice variants of NOX5 have been discovered, with the shortest isoform 5s lacking the calcium-binding domain [62].

Moreover, it was postulated that NADPH oxidases are involved in the ischemic pathway by functioning as oxygen sensors [71], an important aspect in the field of I/R injury. In hypoxic cells, mRNA and protein levels of NOX increased rapidly. The subsequent increase in ROS production led to an upregulated and activated hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) [31], whereas in NOX KO cells, HIF was not induced by hypoxia. Hypoxia seems to regulate all NOX isoforms [7274].

Besides regulation through binding proteins, various stimuli, e.g. angiotensin II, thrombin or growth factors, have also been shown to alter the expression or the activity of NADPH oxidases [47]. NOX homologues can cause different physiological responses when coupled to different agonists.

Enzymatic products

Reduction of oxygen by transmitting one electron from NADPH results in O2 - that can be converted into H2O2 by superoxide dismutases (SOD). All NOX isoforms appear to produce O2 -, except NOX4 that mainly produces H2O2[55, 75] (Figure 1). Because of this H2O2 production, initially several problems were encountered to detect ROS production from the NOX4 isoform [67, 76]. Mutations of NOX4 can switch ROS release from H2O2 to O2 -[75].

Role of NADPH oxidases in stroke

In Table 1 we summarised the published pre-clinical stroke studies that investigated the role of NADPH oxidases for their adherence to some of the STAIR criteria. The first evidence of elevated or decreased NOX levels in a certain tissue is often provided by measuring mRNA levels. However, are mRNA levels really relevant for protein levels or even activity? Further, association of subunits plays a role in NOX activity. For NOX4, mRNA levels were suggested to be related to activity [77], but there are also reports that NOX4 is regulated at the translational level [78]. Generally, a better approach would be to assess protein levels and localisation. However, the major issue with detecting NOX proteins is the lack of specific and well-characterized antibodies.

To study the cause-effect relationship, NOX (or other subunit) overexpressing animals or KO mice are used [79]. Mice with a deleted NOX2 gene are commercially available. In this KO model, exon 3 of the NOX2 gene is deleted [80]. Two NOX1 KO models, lacking the same part of the NOX1 gene (exons 3–6), have been published by different groups [52, 53]. Those mice showed a slightly hypotensive phenotype. Four different NOX4 KO have been published, and none of them shows a basal phenotype [12, 58, 81, 82]. Other studies observed a reduced neuronal death in mice lacking the p47phox subunit, which is required for NADPH oxidase assembly [83]. A problem in KO models is the possibility that a truncated NOX protein or an alternative splice variant with residual activity can still be formed when the deletion takes place in one of the early exons [84, 85]. We therefore believe that it is a better approach to delete the exons coding for NADPH- or FAD-binding sites of the enzyme (exon 14–15 or exon 9 respectively).

An alternative approach in mice or other species is to use small interfering RNA (siRNA) to silence the gene of interest. When using this approach the isoform-specificity of the siRNA should be tested [86], and protein levels should be measured. However, specific antibodies would be needed.

Pharmacological NADPH oxidase inhibition presents another tool to validate the role of NOX in stroke (for review see [31, 87]. Apocynin, diphenylene iodium (DPI) and 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzensulfonylfluorid (AEBSF) have shown neuroprotective potential in vivo [8890]. However, these drugs are not specific to NADPH oxidase inhibition. DPI blocks enzymatic flavin sites in general [91] and AEBSF is a non-specific serine protease inhibitor [92]. For apocynin activation by neutrophil-secreted myeloperoxidase is required, which is not present in some cell types such as VSMCs [93]. Further, apocynin has antioxidant properties [93] and also inhibits rho kinase [94, 95]. Rho kinase-inhibition could be the actual neuroprotective mechanism of apocynin as Rho kinase is implicated in stroke [96]. Therefore, any results on the role of NADPH oxidase obtained by using apocyin should be questioned. Besides, the therapeutic window of apocynin is quite narrow, and doses above 2,5 mg/kg actually increased cerebral hemorrhage and post-stroke mortality [17, 97]. Even so, it is the most frequently used compound to provide NADPH oxidase inhibition in stroke studies. It was reported to reduce post-ischemic ROS production in neurons and microglia [98, 99] and showed neuroprotective effects in stroke [15, 88]. In most studies, apocyin was given prior to stroke onset, which is not reflecting the clinical situation. Apocynin was found to reduce cerebral ROS levels when administered pre-stoke but not post-stroke [17]. Similarly, when given post-stroke, Kleinschnitz et al. observed no effect of apocynin on stroke outcomes in mice [12].

A more specific NOX inhibitor, VAS2870 and its derivative VAS3947, likely inhibit all NOX isoforms. These compounds were shown to be free of general flavin protein inhibition or ROS scavenging activities [100]. Importantly, when given hours after stroke, less ROS production, reduced infarct volume and better neurological function were observed in VAS2870 treated WT mice [12]. However, just recently off-target effects of VAS2870 have been published. As no molecular mechanism has been proposed for NOX inhibition by VAS2870, authors suggest the possibility that Cys thiol alkylation may play a role in NOX4 inhibition [101].

Another specific inhibitor is gp91ds-tat, a peptide that blocks the p47phox binding site of NOX2, thereby inhibiting its activity. Possibly also the activity of NOX1 is inhibited but an effect on NOX4 and NOX5 is unlikely [102]. Recently, GKT136901 was introduced as a highly potent NADPH oxidase inhibitor with dual activity on NOX1 and NOX4 [103]. However, neither data using gp91ds-tat nor GKT136901 in stroke studies have been published.

NOX studies performed in the stroke field

Most data derive from RT-PCR studies, as protein expressions are often very low and specific antibodies difficult to obtain. mRNA and even protein levels of NOX1, 2, 4 and 5 were discovered in healthy brains of mice, rats and humans with NOX2 and 4 being the dominant isoforms [104]. This presence suggests a physiological role. Activities of NADPH oxidases are even higher in rat and mouse cerebral arteries versus systemic vessels [105].


In cell cultures of the murine brain, NOX1 protein was found in neurons, astrocytes, microglia and endothelial cells [11]. Results on the role of NOX1 in stroke using NOX1 KO mice are conflicting. Jackman et al. [10] did not observe an effect of NOX1 deletion on total infarct volume, edema or neurological outcome after tMCAO when compared to WT mice. However, they did find an increased cortical infarct in NOX1 KOs, suggesting that NOX1 might play a role in limiting cortical infarct size. Basal ROS levels in the brains were similar in WT and NOX1 KO mice. A second group [11] observed the opposite effects of NOX1 KO on stroke. They reported a 55% smaller stroke lesion that was paralleled by better neurological outcome in NOX1 KO versus littermate WT mice after 1 h of ischemia and 23 h of reperfusion. However, no difference in lesion size was observed when the ischemic period lasted 2 h or when permanent ischemia was investigated. Apoptosis levels were similar in both strains and the response to antioxidants and NOS inhibitors was similar in both genotypes. Thus, the observed infarct size reduction in NOX1 KO mice was neither related to reduced ROS production nor to reduced NO bioavailability. A third study reported no significant difference in stroke outcome between NOX1 deficient and control mice 1 day after cerebral I/R injury [12].

In summary, it is unlikely that NOX1 plays a major role in stroke in mice. One should also keep in mind that NOX1- and p47phox deficient mice had reduced basal blood pressures and blunted pressor responses to angiotensin II [52, 53, 106], which may interfere with stroke outcome.


The most studied isoform in stroke experiments is NOX2. After transient focal cerebral ischemia NOX2 protein levels were elevated, p47phox translocated to the membrane and ROS production increased [107]. These results show a potential role of NOX2 in stroke pathology (Figure 2). The spatiotemporal profile of NOX2 expression was studied in endothelin-1-induced stroke in conscious rats [108]. NOX2 mRNA was upregulated from 6 hours until 7 days post-stroke in the cortex and striatum. At 6 h post-stroke ROS production was found in neurons, and after 7 days in macrophages and microglia.

Figure 2
figure 2

Schematic overview of NADPH oxidases implicated in stroke. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is formed by endothelial cells at the level of the cerebral capillaries. The figure shows a brain capillary in cross section, showing endothelial tight junctions and end-feet of astrocytes covering these capillaries. The figure also shows pericytes, neurons and microglial cells. Cerebral NOX activation and subsequent ROS generation contributes to BBB disruption, inflammation and postischemic neuronal injury.

Several papers reported a protective effect of deleting NOX2 in mice: NOX2 deficient mice had a 40% smaller infarct volume than WT mice [1321]. In contrast to these studies, Kleinschnitz and colleagues could not reproduce the findings of the previous studies concerning the neuroprotective effect of NOX2 deletion despite using a high number of animals (n = 19) [12]. VAS2870 did not display an additional protective effect in NOX4 knockout mice, whereas it did so in WT mice, further suggesting that NOX1 and 2 have no major implication in stroke pathology [12]. Reasons for the discrepancies are unclear, but several factors may play a role, including different occlusion times and different experimental protocols, as discussed in more detail in the review of Radermacher et al. (Antioxid Redox Signal, in revision).


In the brain, NOX4 is most abundant in endothelial cells, but also present in neurons and astrocytes (Figure 2) [11]. As for NOX2, the spatiotemporal profile of NOX4 mRNA expression after stroke in rats has been measured [108]. NOX4 mRNA was upregulated 6 h post-stroke and then returned to control levels. In contrast, others reported elevated NOX4 mRNA levels in the rat cortex 24 h after pMCAO lasting up to 15 days. The early elevation of NOX4 mRNA is probably due to neuronal expression and the later peak expression to neo-angiogenesis [60]. In another study, NOX4 mRNA was elevated at 12 and 24 h after tMCAO [12]. Here, NOX4 expression was also validated at the protein level (by immunohistochemistry) in brain samples from stroke patients and in mouse brain slices. Co-staining clearly showed colocalization of NOX4 with endothelial cells and neurons. To our knowledge only one study performed stroke experiments in NOX4 KO mice [12] (Figure 3). After exclusion of systemic vascular effects in NOX4 deficient mice, 75% smaller infarct volumes were measured in NOX4 KO compared to WT, NOX1 KO and NOX2 KO mice (Figure 3). In addition, functional outcomes were improved, as was survival. Similar results were obtained in female, in older mice (18–20 weeks) and when using a permanent stroke model. This study shows that NOX4 seems to play a major role in brain damage and thus is a promising target in stroke therapy. In addition to this NOX4 KO study, another group recently showed first results confirming the detrimental role of NOX4 post stroke. For their study, this group used transgenic mice that overexpress NOX4 in endothelial cells. One day after MCAO, the infarcted region of these transgenic animals was bigger than in wildtype mice and suppression of eNOS by NOX4 was proposed as being responsible for infarct enlargement [109].

Figure 3
figure 3

NOX4 deletion confers neuroprotection during stroke[12]. The upper images show the TTC staining of coronal brain slices after cerebral I/R in WT, NOX1-, NOX2- and NOX4 KO mice on 24 hours after tMCAO (1 hour ischemia). The infarct volume (white region) is about 75% smaller in NOX4 deficient mice compared to the other mice, as also illustrated by the bar graph. Stroke experiments were also performed in female mice and in older animals, obtaining the same results.


As NOX5 is not expressed in rats and mice, studies investigating this isoform are scarce, and thus to date no data on the role of NOX5 in stroke are published. To elucidate the possible role of this isoform in animals, transgenic expression of NOX5 in mice is needed, or other animal species, such as rabbits, have to be used.


Excessive NADPH oxidase-derived ROS are likely to lead to neurodegeneration via breakdown of the blood–brain-barrier and/or via neuronal apoptosis (Figure 2). However, ROS-scavenging antioxidants have shown disappointing results in clinical trials. Stroke research should move on and tackle oxidative stress at its root, meaning specifically inhibiting the disease-relevant source of ROS, such as NADPH oxidases, rather than attempting to detoxify them in an untargeted fashion after they have been formed. When neuroprotection during stroke was studied, a maximal reduction in infarct volume of 30-40% was achieved in NOX2 deficient mice [110]. However, in NOX4 KO mice, bigger changes (75%) could be observed [12]. Furthermore, in NOX4 KO mice no basal phenotype has been observed yet, suggesting that side effects from therapeutic inhibition of NOX4 should be rather small.


Until now, the cellular and molecular origin of ROS causing I/R injury in the brain has not been fully identified yet. However, NADPH oxidases are promising therapeutic targets for stroke therapy. Stroke therapy has a very short therapeutic window; the drug has to be administered quite soon after stroke onset to avoid neuronal death. If NOX inhibitors turn out to be promising therapeutic agents, the optimal therapeutic window has to be established and the drug will probably have to be tested in presence of rt-PA that will still be used for initial clot lysis.

Modern neuroimaging techniques are now available, particularly magnetic resonance imaging and angiography of the brain [111113]. These tools should also be used in pre-clinical studies to monitor long-term outcome and to show that the treatment not only alters recovery kinetics, but really provides long-term protection [114116]. Only then it can be ruled out that the evolution of stroke is just slowed down rather than stopped.

Despite recent progress, much remains to be learned about NADPH oxidases as potential pathological sources of ROS production. Therefore, for instance, conditional KO models in specific cell types are warranted and more studies are particularly needed on the non-rodent isoform NOX5. As studies on the role of NADPH oxidases in stroke so far focussed on mice or rats, other species than rodents could be useful for clinical translation.

Excitingly, NADPH oxidases are not only implicated in stroke, they may also serve as novel therapeutic target for other cardiovascular [117] and neurodegenerative diseases [118]. As such, NOX inhibitors could thus serve as powerful therapeutic strategy in pathologies where oxidative stress is implicated. Clearly, isoform-selective NOX inhibitors would help to establish the role of the different isoforms in diseases and to successfully translate this novel strategy into the clinic. This would be a major breakthrough after years without any major therapeutic progress in stroke therapy.







Blood brain barrier


Complementary deoxyribonucleic acid


Chronic granulomatous disease


Central nervous system




Cytochrome P450




Diphenylene iodonium


Dual oxidase


Endothelial cells


Endoplasmic reticulum


Flavin adenine dinucleotide


Food and Drug Administration


Hydrogen peroxide


Hypoxia inducible factor


Heat shock protein 90






Middle cerebral artery occlusion


Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate


Nitric oxide


Nitric oxide synthase


catalytic subunit of NADPH oxidase


not specified






Polymerase chain reaction


Protein disulphide isomerase


Polymerase (DNA-directed) delta interacting protein


Reactive nitrogen species


Reactive oxygen species


Small interfering ribonucleic acid


Superoxide dismutase


Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable


Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator


2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride


Vascular smooth muscle cells


Xanthine oxidase.


  1. Redon J, Olsen MH, Cooper RS, Zurriaga O, Martinez-Beneito MA, Laurent S, Cifkova R, Coca A, Mancia G: Stroke mortality and trends from 1990 to 2006 in 39 countries from Europe and Central Asia: implications for control of high blood pressure. Eur Heart J 2011, 32: 1424–1431. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr045

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dirnagl U: Bench to bedside: the quest for quality in experimental stroke research. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2006, 26: 1465–1478. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600298

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. O'Collins VE, Macleod MR, Donnan GA, Horky LL, van der Worp BH, Howells DW: 1,026 experimental treatments in acute stroke. Ann Neurol 2006, 59: 467–477. 10.1002/ana.20741

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Macleod MR, Fisher M, O'Collins V, Sena ES, Dirnagl U, Bath PM, Buchan A, van der Worp HB, Traystman R, Minematsu K, et al.: Good laboratory practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench. Stroke 2009, 40: e50-e52. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.525386

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Braeuninger S, Kleinschnitz C: Rodent models of focal cerebral ischemia: procedural pitfalls and translational problems. Exp Transl Stroke Med 2009, 1: 8. 10.1186/2040-7378-1-8

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Howells DW, Porritt MJ, Rewell SS, O'Collins V, Sena ES, van der Worp HB, Traystman RJ, Macleod MR: Different strokes for different folks: the rich diversity of animal models of focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010, 30: 1412–1431. 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.66

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sena ES, van der Worp HB, Bath PM, Howells DW, Macleod MR: Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy. PLoS Biol 2010, 8: e1000344. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000344

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. STAIR: Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development. Stroke 1999, 30: 2752–2758.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fisher M, Feuerstein G, Howells DW, Hurn PD, Kent TA, Savitz SI, Lo EH: Update of the stroke therapy academic industry roundtable preclinical recommendations. Stroke 2009, 40: 2244–2250. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541128

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jackman KA, Miller AA, Drummond GR, Sobey CG: Importance of NOX1 for angiotensin II-induced cerebrovascular superoxide production and cortical infarct volume following ischemic stroke. Brain Res 2009, 1286: 215–220.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kahles T, Kohnen A, Heumueller S, Rappert A, Bechmann I, Liebner S, Wittko IM, Neumann-Haefelin T, Steinmetz H, Schroeder K, Brandes RP: NADPH oxidase Nox1 contributes to ischemic injury in experimental stroke in mice. Neurobiol Dis 2010, 40: 185–192. 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.05.023

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kleinschnitz C, Grund H, Wingler K, Armitage ME, Jones E, Mittal M, Barit D, Schwarz T, Geis C, Kraft P, et al.: Post-stroke inhibition of induced NADPH oxidase type 4 prevents oxidative stress and neurodegeneration. PLoS Biol 2010, 8: e1000479. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000479

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walder CE, Green SP, Darbonne WC, Mathias J, Rae J, Dinauer MC, Curnutte JT, Thomas GR: Ischemic stroke injury is reduced in mice lacking a functional NADPH oxidase. Stroke 1997, 28: 2252–2258. 10.1161/01.STR.28.11.2252

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kunz A, Anrather J, Zhou P, Orio M, Iadecola C: Cyclooxygenase-2 does not contribute to postischemic production of reactive oxygen species. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007, 27: 545–551. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600369

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kahles T, Luedike P, Endres M, Galla HJ, Steinmetz H, Busse R, Neumann-Haefelin T, Brandes RP: NADPH oxidase plays a central role in blood–brain barrier damage in experimental stroke. Stroke 2007, 38: 3000–3006. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.489765

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen H, Song YS, Chan PH: Inhibition of NADPH oxidase is neuroprotective after ischemia-reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009, 29: 1262–1272. 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.47

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jackman KA, Miller AA, De Silva TM, Crack PJ, Drummond GR, Sobey CG: Reduction of cerebral infarct volume by apocynin requires pretreatment and is absent in Nox2-deficient mice. Br J Pharmacol 2009, 156: 680–688. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2008.00073.x

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brait VH, Jackman KA, Walduck AK, Selemidis S, Diep H, Mast AE, Guida E, Broughton BR, Drummond GR, Sobey CG: Mechanisms contributing to cerebral infarct size after stroke: gender, reperfusion, T lymphocytes, and Nox2-derived superoxide. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010, 30: 1306–1317. 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.14

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen H, Kim GS, Okami N, Narasimhan P, Chan PH: NADPH oxidase is involved in post-ischemic brain inflammation. Neurobiol Dis 2011, 42: 341–348. 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.01.027

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tang XN, Zheng Z, Giffard RG, Yenari MA: Significance of marrow-derived nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase in experimental ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol 2011, 70: 606–615. 10.1002/ana.22476

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. De Silva TM, Brait VH, Drummond GR, Sobey CG, Miller AA: Nox2 oxidase activity accounts for the oxidative stress and vasomotor dysfunction in mouse cerebral arteries following ischemic stroke. PLoS One 2011, 6: e28393. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028393

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zielonka J, Hardy M, Kalyanaraman B: HPLC study of oxidation products of hydroethidine in chemical and biological systems: ramifications in superoxide measurements. Free Radic Biol Med 2009, 46: 329–338. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.10.031

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan PH: Reactive oxygen radicals in signaling and damage in the ischemic brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001, 21: 2–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lees KR, Zivin JA, Ashwood T, Davalos A, Davis SM, Diener HC, Grotta J, Lyden P, Shuaib A, Hardemark HG, Wasiewski WW: NXY-059 for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2006, 354: 588–600. 10.1056/NEJMoa052980

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shuaib A, Lees KR, Lyden P, Grotta J, Davalos A, Davis SM, Diener HC, Ashwood T, Wasiewski WW, Emeribe U: NXY-059 for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2007, 357: 562–571. 10.1056/NEJMoa070240

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Diener HC, Lees KR, Lyden P, Grotta J, Davalos A, Davis SM, Shuaib A, Ashwood T, Wasiewski W, Alderfer V, et al.: NXY-059 for the treatment of acute stroke: pooled analysis of the SAINT I and II Trials. Stroke 2008, 39: 1751–1758. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.503334

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Amaro S, Chamorro A: Translational stroke research of the combination of thrombolysis and antioxidant therapy. Stroke 2011, 42: 1495–1499. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.615039

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bath PM, Gray LJ, Bath AJ, Buchan A, Miyata T, Green AR: Effects of NXY-059 in experimental stroke: an individual animal meta-analysis. Br J Pharmacol 2009, 157: 1157–1171. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00196.x

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bjelakovic G, Nikolova D, Gluud LL, Simonetti RG, Gluud C: Mortality in randomized trials of antioxidant supplements for primary and secondary prevention: systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama 2007, 297: 842–857. 10.1001/jama.297.8.842

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Miller ER, Pastor-Barriuso R, Dalal D, Riemersma RA, Appel LJ, Guallar E: Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementation may increase all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med 2005, 142: 37–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wingler K, Hermans J, Schiffers P, Moens A, Paul M, Schmidt H: NOX 1, 2, 4, 5: Counting out oxidative stress. Br J Pharmacol 2011, 164: 866–883. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01249.x

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Steinhubl SR: Why have antioxidants failed in clinical trials? Am J Cardiol 2008, 101: 14D-19D.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Skulachev VP: Why are mitochondria involved in apoptosis? Permeability transition pores and apoptosis as selective mechanisms to eliminate superoxide-producing mitochondria and cell. FEBS Lett 1996, 397: 7–10. 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00989-1

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Goldstein LB, Bushnell CD, Adams RJ, Appel LJ, Braun LT, Chaturvedi S, Creager MA, Culebras A, Eckel RH, Hart RG, et al.: Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2011, 42: 517–584. 10.1161/STR.0b013e3181fcb238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. McNally JS, Davis ME, Giddens DP, Saha A, Hwang J, Dikalov S, Jo H, Harrison DG: Role of xanthine oxidoreductase and NAD(P)H oxidase in endothelial superoxide production in response to oscillatory shear stress. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003, 285: H2290-H2297.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Paravicini TM, Sobey CG: Cerebral vascular effects of reactive oxygen species: recent evidence for a role of NADPH-oxidase. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2003, 30: 855–859. 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2003.03920.x

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang R, Brennan ML, Shen Z, MacPherson JC, Schmitt D, Molenda CE, Hazen SL: Myeloperoxidase functions as a major enzymatic catalyst for initiation of lipid peroxidation at sites of inflammation. J Biol Chem 2002, 277: 46116–46122. 10.1074/jbc.M209124200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vasquez-Vivar J, Kalyanaraman B, Martasek P, Hogg N, Masters BS, Karoui H, Tordo P, Pritchard KA: Superoxide generation by endothelial nitric oxide synthase: the influence of cofactors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95: 9220–9225. 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9220

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fleming I, Michaelis UR, Bredenkotter D, Fisslthaler B, Dehghani F, Brandes RP, Busse R: Endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor synthase (Cytochrome P450 2C9) is a functionally significant source of reactive oxygen species in coronary arteries. Circ Res 2001, 88: 44–51. 10.1161/01.RES.88.1.44

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brandes RP, Weissmann N, Schroder K: NADPH oxidases in cardiovascular disease. Free Radic Biol Med 2010, 49: 687–706. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.04.030

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bedard K, Krause KH: The NOX family of ROS-generating NADPH oxidases: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev 2007, 87: 245–313. 10.1152/physrev.00044.2005

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Griendling KK, Sorescu D, Ushio-Fukai M: NAD(P)H oxidase: role in cardiovascular biology and disease. Circ Res 2000, 86: 494–501. 10.1161/01.RES.86.5.494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Green SP, Cairns B, Rae J, Errett-Baroncini C, Hongo JA, Erickson RW, Curnutte JT: Induction of gp91-phox, a component of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase, in microglial cells during central nervous system inflammation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001, 21: 374–384.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jana A, Pahan K: Fibrillar amyloid-beta peptides kill human primary neurons via NADPH oxidase-mediated activation of neutral sphingomyelinase. Implications for Alzheimer's disease. J Biol Chem 2004, 279: 51451–51459. 10.1074/jbc.M404635200

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bedard K, Lardy B, Krause KH: NOX family NADPH oxidases: not just in mammals. Biochimie 2007, 89: 1107–1112. 10.1016/j.biochi.2007.01.012

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Opitz N, Drummond GR, Selemidis S, Meurer S, Schmidt HH: The 'A's and 'O's of NADPH oxidase regulation: a commentary on "Subcellular localization and function of alternatively spliced Noxo1 isoforms". Free Radic Biol Med 2007, 42: 175–179. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.11.003

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Brown DI, Griendling KK: Nox proteins in signal transduction. Free Radic Biol Med 2009, 47: 1239–1253. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.07.023

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lambeth JD, Krause KH, Clark RA: NOX enzymes as novel targets for drug development. Semin Immunopathol 2008, 30: 339–363. 10.1007/s00281-008-0123-6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Rokutan K, Kawahara T, Kuwano Y, Tominaga K, Nishida K, Teshima-Kondo S: Nox enzymes and oxidative stress in the immunopathology of the gastrointestinal tract. Semin Immunopathol 2008, 30: 315–327. 10.1007/s00281-008-0124-5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sorce S, Krause KH: NOX enzymes in the central nervous system: from signaling to disease. Antioxid Redox Signal 2009, 11: 2481–2504. 10.1089/ars.2009.2578

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Krause KH: Tissue Distribution and Putative Physiological Function of NOX Family NADPH Oxidases. Jpn J Infect Dis 2004, 57: S28-S29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gavazzi G, Banfi B, Deffert C, Fiette L, Schappi M, Herrmann F, Krause KH: Decreased blood pressure in NOX1-deficient mice. FEBS Lett 2006, 580: 497–504. 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.12.049

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Matsuno K, Yamada H, Iwata K, Jin D, Katsuyama M, Matsuki M, Takai S, Yamanishi K, Miyazaki M, Matsubara H, Yabe-Nishimura C: Nox1 is involved in angiotensin II-mediated hypertension: a study in Nox1-deficient mice. Circulation 2005, 112: 2677–2685. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.573709

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu J, Ormsby A, Oja-Tebbe N, Pagano PJ: Gene transfer of NAD(P)H oxidase inhibitor to the vascular adventitia attenuates medial smooth muscle hypertrophy. Circ Res 2004, 95: 587–594. 10.1161/01.RES.0000142317.88591.e6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Geiszt M, Kopp JB, Varnai P, Leto TL: Identification of renox, an NAD(P)H oxidase in kidney. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97: 8010–8014. 10.1073/pnas.130135897

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Mittal M, Roth M, Konig P, Hofmann S, Dony E, Goyal P, Selbitz AC, Schermuly RT, Ghofrani HA, Kwapiszewska G, et al.: Hypoxia-dependent regulation of nonphagocytic NADPH oxidase subunit NOX4 in the pulmonary vasculature. Circ Res 2007, 101: 258–267. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.148015

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Griendling KK: Novel NAD(P)H oxidases in the cardiovascular system. Heart 2004, 90: 491–493. 10.1136/hrt.2003.029397

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang M, Brewer AC, Schroder K, Santos CX, Grieve DJ, Wang M, Anilkumar N, Yu B, Dong X, Walker SJ, et al.: NADPH oxidase-4 mediates protection against chronic load-induced stress in mouse hearts by enhancing angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107: 18121–18126. 10.1073/pnas.1009700107

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sedwick C: NOX4: a guilty party in stroke damage. PLoS Biol 2010, 8: e1000478. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000478

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Vallet P, Charnay Y, Steger K, Ogier-Denis E, Kovari E, Herrmann F, Michel JP, Szanto I: Neuronal expression of the NADPH oxidase NOX4, and its regulation in mouse experimental brain ischemia. Neuroscience 2005, 132: 233–238. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.12.038

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Guzik TJ, Chen W, Gongora MC, Guzik B, Lob HE, Mangalat D, Hoch N, Dikalov S, Rudzinski P, Kapelak B, et al.: Calcium-Dependent NOX5 Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate Oxidase Contributes to Vascular Oxidative Stress in Human Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 52: 1803–1809. 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.063

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. BelAiba RS, Djordjevic T, Petry A, Diemer K, Bonello S, Banfi B, Hess J, Pogrebniak A, Bickel C, Gorlach A: NOX5 variants are functionally active in endothelial cells. Free Radic Biol Med 2007, 42: 446–459. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.10.054

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Rivera J, Sobey CG, Walduck AK, Drummond GR: Nox isoforms in vascular pathophysiology: insights from transgenic and knockout mouse models. Redox Rep 2010, 15: 50–63. 10.1179/174329210X12650506623401

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Ambasta RK, Kumar P, Griendling KK, Schmidt HH, Busse R, Brandes RP: Direct interaction of the novel Nox proteins with p22phox is required for the formation of a functionally active NADPH oxidase. J Biol Chem 2004, 279: 45935–45941. 10.1074/jbc.M406486200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Cheng G, Lambeth JD: NOXO1, regulation of lipid binding, localization, and activation of Nox1 by the Phox homology (PX) domain. J Biol Chem 2004, 279: 4737–4742.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Helmcke I, Heumuller S, Tikkanen R, Schroder K, Brandes RP: Identification of structural elements in Nox1 and Nox4 controlling localization and activity. Antioxid Redox Signal 2009, 11: 1279–1287. 10.1089/ars.2008.2383

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Martyn KD, Frederick LM, von Loehneysen K, Dinauer MC, Knaus UG: Functional analysis of Nox4 reveals unique characteristics compared to other NADPH oxidases. Cell Signal 2006, 18: 69–82. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.03.023

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Lyle AN, Deshpande NN, Taniyama Y, Seidel-Rogol B, Pounkova L, Du P, Papaharalambus C, Lassegue B, Griendling KK: Poldip2, a novel regulator of Nox4 and cytoskeletal integrity in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res 2009, 105: 249–259. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.193722

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Janiszewski M, Lopes LR, Carmo AO, Pedro MA, Brandes RP, Santos CX, Laurindo FR: Regulation of NAD(P)H oxidase by associated protein disulfide isomerase in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 2005, 280: 40813–40819. 10.1074/jbc.M509255200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Chen F, Pandey D, Chadli A, Catravas JD, Chen T, Fulton DJ: Hsp90 regulates NADPH oxidase activity and is necessary for superoxide but not hydrogen peroxide production. Antioxid Redox Signal 2011, 14: 2107–2119. 10.1089/ars.2010.3669

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Acker T, Acker H: Cellular oxygen sensing need in CNS function: physiological and pathological implications. J Exp Biol 2004, 207: 3171–3188. 10.1242/jeb.01075

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Diebold I, Petry A, Hess J, Gorlach A: The NADPH oxidase subunit NOX4 is a new target gene of the hypoxia-inducible factor-1. Mol Biol Cell 2010, 21: 2087–2096. 10.1091/mbc.E09-12-1003

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Yuan G, Khan SA, Luo W, Nanduri J, Semenza GL, Prabhakar NR: Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 mediates increased expression of NADPH oxidase-2 in response to intermittent hypoxia. J Cell Physiol 2011, 226: 2925–2933. 10.1002/jcp.22640

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Goyal P, Weissmann N, Grimminger F, Hegel C, Bader L, Rose F, Fink L, Ghofrani HA, Schermuly RT, Schmidt HH, et al.: Upregulation of NAD(P)H oxidase 1 in hypoxia activates hypoxia-inducible factor 1 via increase in reactive oxygen species. Free Radic Biol Med 2004, 36: 1279–1288. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.02.071

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Takac I, Schroder K, Zhang L, Lardy B, Anilkumar N, Lambeth JD, Shah AM, Morel F, Brandes RP: The E-loop is involved in hydrogen peroxide formation by the NADPH oxidase Nox4. J Biol Chem 2011, 286: 13304–13313. 10.1074/jbc.M110.192138

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Serrander L, Cartier L, Bedard K, Banfi B, Lardy B, Plastre O, Sienkiewicz A, Forro L, Schlegel W, Krause KH: NOX4 activity is determined by mRNA levels and reveals a unique pattern of ROS generation. Biochem J 2007, 406: 105–114. 10.1042/BJ20061903

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Paravicini TM, Chrissobolis S, Drummond GR, Sobey CG: Increased NADPH-oxidase activity and Nox4 expression during chronic hypertension is associated with enhanced cerebral vasodilatation to NADPH in vivo. Stroke 2004, 35: 584–589. 10.1161/01.STR.0000112974.37028.58

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Peshavariya H, Jiang F, Taylor CJ, Selemidis S, Chang CW, Dusting GJ: Translation-linked mRNA destabilization accompanying serum-induced Nox4 expression in human endothelial cells. Antioxid Redox Signal 2009, 11: 2399–2408. 10.1089/ars.2009.2579

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Ray R, Murdoch CE, Wang M, Santos CX, Zhang M, Alom-Ruiz S, Anilkumar N, Ouattara A, Cave AC, Walker SJ, et al.: Endothelial Nox4 NADPH oxidase enhances vasodilatation and reduces blood pressure in vivo. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2011, 31: 1368–1376. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.219238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Pollock JD, Williams DA, Gifford MA, Li LL, Du X, Fisherman J, Orkin SH, Doerschuk CM, Dinauer MC: Mouse model of X-linked chronic granulomatous disease, an inherited defect in phagocyte superoxide production. Nat Genet 1995, 9: 202–209. 10.1038/ng0295-202

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Kuroda J, Ago T, Matsushima S, Zhai P, Schneider MD, Sadoshima J: NADPH oxidase 4 (Nox4) is a major source of oxidative stress in the failing heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107: 15565–15570. 10.1073/pnas.1002178107

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Carnesecchi S, Deffert C, Donati Y, Basset O, Hinz B, Preynat-Seauve O, Guichard C, Arbiser JL, Banfi B, Pache JC, et al.: A Key Role for NOX4 in Epithelial Cell Death During Development of Lung Fibrosis. Antioxid Redox Signal 2011, 15: 607–619. 10.1089/ars.2010.3829

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Brennan AM, Suh SW, Won SJ, Narasimhan P, Kauppinen TM, Lee H, Edling Y, Chan PH, Swanson RA: NADPH oxidase is the primary source of superoxide induced by NMDA receptor activation. Nat Neurosci 2009, 12: 857–863. 10.1038/nn.2334

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Arakawa N, Katsuyama M, Matsuno K, Urao N, Tabuchi Y, Okigaki M, Matsubara H, Yabe-Nishimura C: Novel transcripts of Nox1 are regulated by alternative promoters and expressed under phenotypic modulation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Biochem J 2006, 398: 303–310. 10.1042/BJ20060300

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Ben Mkaddem S, Pedruzzi E, Werts C, Coant N, Bens M, Cluzeaud F, Goujon JM, Ogier-Denis E, Vandewalle A: Eat shock protein gp96 and NAD(P)H oxidase 4 play key roles in Toll-like receptor 4-activated apoptosis during renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Cell Death Differ 2010, 17: 1474–1485. 10.1038/cdd.2010.26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Schroder K, Wandzioch K, Helmcke I, Brandes RP: Nox4 Acts as a Switch Between Differentiation and Proliferation in Preadipocytes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2009, 29: 239–245. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.174219

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Jaquet V, Scapozza L, Clark RA, Krause KH, Lambeth JD: Small-molecule NOX inhibitors: ROS-generating NADPH oxidases as therapeutic targets. Antioxid Redox Signal 2009, 11: 2535–2552. 10.1089/ars.2009.2585

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Wang TJ, Gona P, Larson MG, Tofler GH, Levy D, Newton-Cheh C, Jacques PF, Rifai N, Selhub J, Robins SJ, et al.: Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death. N Engl J Med 2006, 355: 2631–2639. 10.1056/NEJMoa055373

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Nagel S, Genius J, Heiland S, Horstmann S, Gardner H, Wagner S: Diphenyleneiodonium and dimethylsulfoxide for treatment of reperfusion injury in cerebral ischemia of the rat. Brain Res 2007, 1132: 210–217.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Megyeri P, Nemeth L, Pabst KM, Pabst MJ, Deli MA, Abraham CS: 4-(2-Aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride attenuates tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha-induced blood–brain barrier opening. Eur J Pharmacol 1999, 374: 207–211. 10.1016/S0014-2999(99)00224-1

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Williams HC, Griendling KK: NADPH oxidase inhibitors: new antihypertensive agents? J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2007, 50: 9–16. 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318063e820

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Diatchuk V, Lotan O, Koshkin V, Wikstroem P, Pick E: Inhibition of NADPH oxidase activation by 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride and related compounds. J Biol Chem 1997, 272: 13292–13301. 10.1074/jbc.272.20.13292

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Heumuller S, Wind S, Barbosa-Sicard E, Schmidt HH, Busse R, Schroder K, Brandes RP: Apocynin is not an inhibitor of vascular NADPH oxidases but an antioxidant. Hypertension 2008, 51: 211–217. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.100214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Schluter T, Steinbach AC, Steffen A, Rettig R, Grisk O: Apocynin-induced vasodilation involves Rho kinase inhibition but not NADPH oxidase inhibition. Cardiovasc Res 2008, 80: 271–279. 10.1093/cvr/cvn185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Touyz RM: Apocynin, NADPH oxidase, and vascular cells: a complex matter. Hypertension 2008, 51: 172–174. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.103200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Shin HK, Salomone S, Potts EM, Lee SW, Millican E, Noma K, Huang PL, Boas DA, Liao JK, Moskowitz MA, Ayata C: Rho-kinase inhibition acutely augments blood flow in focal cerebral ischemia via endothelial mechanisms. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007, 27: 998–1009.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Tang XN, Cairns B, Cairns N, Yenari MA: Apocynin improves outcome in experimental stroke with a narrow dose range. Neuroscience 2008, 154: 556–562. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.03.090

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Chen JX, Zeng H, Tuo QH, Yu H, Meyrick B, Aschner JL: NADPH oxidase modulates myocardial Akt, ERK1/2 activation, and angiogenesis after hypoxia-reoxygenation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007, 292: H1664-H1674.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Suh SW, Gum ET, Hamby AM, Chan PH, Swanson RA: Hypoglycemic neuronal death is triggered by glucose reperfusion and activation of neuronal NADPH oxidase. J Clin Invest 2007, 117: 910–918. 10.1172/JCI30077

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Wind S, Beuerlein K, Eucker T, Muller H, Scheurer P, Armitage ME, Ho H, Schmidt HH, Wingler K: Comparative pharmacology of chemically distinct NADPH oxidase inhibitors. Br J Pharmacol 2010, 161: 885–898. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00920.x

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Sun QA, Hess DT, Wang B, Miyagi M, Stamler JS: Off-target thiol alkylation by the NADPH oxidase inhibitor 3-benzyl-7-(2-benzoxazolyl)thio-1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-d]pyrimidine (VAS2870). Free Radic Biol Med 2012, 52: 1897–1902. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.02.046

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Rey FE, Cifuentes ME, Kiarash A, Quinn MT, Pagano PJ: Novel competitive inhibitor of NAD(P)H oxidase assembly attenuates vascular O(2)(−) and systolic blood pressure in mice. Circ Res 2001, 89: 408–414. 10.1161/hh1701.096037

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Laleu B, Gaggini F, Orchard M, Fioraso-Cartier L, Cagnon L, Houngninou-Molango S, Gradia A, Duboux G, Merlot C, Heitz F, et al.: First in class, potent, and orally bioavailable NADPH oxidase isoform 4 (Nox4) inhibitors for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Med Chem 2010, 53: 7715–7730. 10.1021/jm100773e

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Infanger DW, Sharma RV, Davisson RL: NADPH oxidases of the brain: distribution, regulation, and function. Antioxid Redox Signal 2006, 8: 1583–1596. 10.1089/ars.2006.8.1583

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Miller AA, Drummond GR, Schmidt HH, Sobey CG: NADPH oxidase activity and function are profoundly greater in cerebral versus systemic arteries. Circ Res 2005, 97: 1055–1062. 10.1161/01.RES.0000189301.10217.87

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Landmesser U, Cai H, Dikalov S, McCann L, Hwang J, Jo H, Holland SM, Harrison DG: Role of p47(phox) in vascular oxidative stress and hypertension caused by angiotensin II. Hypertension 2002, 40: 511–515. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000032100.23772.98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Hong H, Zeng JS, Kreulen DL, Kaufman DI, Chen AF: Atorvastatin protects against cerebral infarction via inhibition of NADPH oxidase-derived superoxide in ischemic stroke. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006, 291: H2210-H2215. 10.1152/ajpheart.01270.2005

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. McCann SK, Dusting GJ, Roulston CL: Early increase of Nox4 NADPH oxidase and superoxide generation following endothelin-1-induced stroke in conscious rats. J Neurosci Res 2008, 86: 2524–2534. 10.1002/jnr.21700

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Arimura K, Ago T, Kuroda J, Ishitsuka K, Nishimura A, Sugimori H, Kamouchi M, Sasaki T, Kitazono T: Role of NADPH oxidase 4 in Brain Endothelial cells after Ischemic Stroke. Stroke 2012, 43: A2514.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Crossley NA, Sena E, Goehler J, Horn J, van der Worp B, Bath PM, Macleod M, Dirnagl U: Empirical evidence of bias in the design of experimental stroke studies: a metaepidemiologic approach. Stroke 2008, 39: 929–934. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.498725

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Alberts MJ, Latchaw RE, Jagoda A, Wechsler LR, Crocco T, George MG, Connolly ES, Mancini B, Prudhomme S, Gress D, et al.: Revised and Updated Recommendations for the Establishment of Primary Stroke Centers: A Summary Statement From the Brain Attack Coalition. Stroke 2011, 42: 2651–2665. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.615336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Seitz RJ, Donnan GA: Role of neuroimaging in promoting long-term recovery from ischemic stroke. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010, 32: 756–772. 10.1002/jmri.22315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Pham M, Kleinschnitz C, Helluy X, Bartsch AJ, Austinat M, Behr VC, Renne T, Nieswandt B, Stoll G, Bendszus M: Enhanced cortical reperfusion protects coagulation factor XII-deficient mice from ischemic stroke as revealed by high-field MRI. NeuroImage 2010, 49: 2907–2914. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.061

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Granziera C, D'Arceuil H, Zai L, Magistretti PJ, Sorensen AG, de Crespigny AJ: Long-term monitoring of post-stroke plasticity after transient cerebral ischemia in mice using in vivo and ex vivo diffusion tensor MRI. Open Neuroimag J 2007, 1: 10–17. 10.2174/1874440000701010010

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Fau S, Po C, Gillet B, Sizonenko S, Mariani J, Meric P, Charriaut-Marlangue C: Effect of the reperfusion after cerebral ischemia in neonatal rats using MRI monitoring. Exp Neurol 2007, 208: 297–304. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.08.021

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Sood RR, Taheri S, Candelario-Jalil E, Estrada EY, Rosenberg GA: Early beneficial effect of matrix metalloproteinase inhibition on blood–brain barrier permeability as measured by magnetic resonance imaging countered by impaired long-term recovery after stroke in rat brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2008, 28: 431–438. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600534

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Maalouf RM, Eid AA, Gorin YC, Block K, Escobar GP, Bailey S: Abboud HE: Nox4-Derived Reactive Oxygen Species Mediate Cardiomyocyte Injury In Early Type 1 Diabetes. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2011, 302: C597-C604.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Bruce-Keller AJ, Gupta S, Knight AG, Beckett TL, McMullen JM, Davis PR, Murphy MP, Van Eldik LJ, St Clair D, Keller JN: Cognitive impairment in humanized APPxPS1 mice is linked to Abeta(1–42) and NOX activation. Neurobiol Dis 2011, 44: 317–326. 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.07.012

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


HHHWS and CK acknowledge funding from the EU IRG (PIRG07-GA-2010-268235), NHMRC (606711) and DFG (KL2323/4-1), Servier and Novartis Pharma GmbH, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harald HHW Schmidt.

Additional information

Competing interests

Harald Schmidt has received funding from Servier to conduct research on NADPH oxidase and has founded and holds shares in Vasopharm GmbH, a biotech company engaged in NOX inhibitor development. Christoph Kleinschnitz has received funding from Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany to conduct research on NADPH oxidase. Kirstin Wingler is a former employee of Vasopharm GmbH.

Authors’ contributions

The authors have made the following declaration about their contributions: Conceived and gave final approval of the manuscript: HHHWS. Wrote draft of the paper: KAR. Contributed to the writing by critically revising and proof reading of the manuscript: KW, SA, PK, JJRH, CK. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radermacher, K.A., Wingler, K., Kleikers, P. et al. The 1027th target candidate in stroke: Will NADPH oxidase hold up?. Exp & Trans Stroke Med 4, 11 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: